This is a preliminary design and operating-guidance tool for ultraviolet (UV) treatment — both disinfection (a pathogen barrier) and advanced oxidation (UV-AOP) for taste/odour and micropollutant destruction. It helps you scope reactor sizing, chemistry, and running costs before you talk to suppliers.
Start here on Setup: choose your operating mode, lamp type and reactor arrangement, then enter your flows and source-water quality. The other tabs update automatically.
New to it? Flick the example switch below to load a worked case and see every tab populate. Turn it off to clear back to a blank sheet.
This tab helps you scope a UV disinfection barrier and lines the design up against the NZ Water Services (Drinking Water Quality Assurance) Rules 2026 — the UV rules (T3.BU) and protozoa UV rules (T3.PU), in force 1 July 2027.
The sizing figures below are preliminary hydraulic guidance to help you shortlist units and estimate power. They are not a validation and do not replace the supplier's certified flow-vs-dose envelope.
| Organism | Log credit | Indicative RED (mJ/cm²) |
|---|
Sleeve fouling. Iron, manganese and hardness precipitate on the quartz sleeves and reduce UV transmission, so the delivered dose falls between cleans. The UVI sensor should see this, but only if the duty sensor is trended and alarmed.
Cleaning system is part of the validation. If fouling control is required, the unit must be validated with that system operating as it will in service:
Hydraulics and configuration must match the validation. UV validation is specific to the tested geometry and flow field. The following must be the same in service as in the validation certificate, or the credit does not hold:
This tool does not validate any of the above. Confirm each item against the supplier's validation certificate to a designated standard (USEPA UVDGM, DVGW, ÖNORM, DIN, or NSF/ANSI 55 Class A).
UV-AOP pairs UV light with an oxidant (H₂O₂ or pre-formed chlorine) to generate hydroxyl radicals (•OH) — an aggressive, short-lived species that destroys taste-and-odour compounds and micropollutants that survive conventional treatment.
These are literature-kinetics estimates for scoping. Site-specific performance should be confirmed by bench/pilot trials.
| Scavenger | Conc. | k(•OH) | Scav. rate share |
|---|
| Contaminant | In | Out | Log | % destroyed |
|---|
When you dose hydrogen peroxide for AOP, most of it survives the reactor and must be removed before the water enters supply. This tab sizes the quench.
Applies to UV/H₂O₂ mode. UV/chlorine and UV-only modes leave no peroxide residual to manage.
| Method | Sizing basis | Consumable | Notes |
|---|
Estimates annual running cost: energy, lamp / ballast / UVI-sensor replacement, and any AOP chemicals and quench consumables. Prices and component lives live in the ⚙ Settings panel so you can tune them to local rates.
Use it to compare LPHO vs medium-pressure, or disinfection-only vs AOP, on a whole-of-life basis. Figures are indicative and exclude capital, labour and maintenance overheads.
| Component | $/yr | Share |
|---|
A one-glance roll-up of the design: dose basis, reactor sizing, AOP destruction, operating cost and the key DWQAR 2026 compliance points. Use it as the cover sheet when you take the scheme to suppliers or reviewers.
The single place to get your work out of the tool.
.json holding every input and result. Keep it, share it, or load it back later to pick up where you left off.Generates a formatted report of the selected sections. Use your browser's “Save as PDF” in the print dialog. Header/footer are off by design — turn off “Headers and footers” in the dialog if your browser adds them.
All inputs and headline results as a single CSV.
Save a JSON file of all settings and results to your downloads, or load one back in.